Cinema verite is a documentary
movement in the late 1950’s that made reality its mandate. Basically, it wanted
to capture life as it was unfolding and be as truthful as possible. Originally
they used lightweight film equipment so the filmmakers could record events
without judgment or intrusion. The films commonly had no narration, music, or
interviews. With panelists Robert Drew, Don Pennebaker, Jon Alpert, Brett
Morgan and Rory Kennedy, this session of Museum of TV and Radio covered the
evolution of cinema verite over four decades. As well as answered the most
important question when it comes to verite, “can you capture real life on
camera?”
To begin, they showed a clip from
one of each panelist’s cinema verite films. The first was Robert Drew’s film “Primary”
about President Kennedy. The clip contained innovative movements of the camera.
Drew says, “If the camera moves that’s fine, as long as it moves with the
character in the story.” Within the clip, the camera is lifted over the
cameraman’s head and carried behind Kennedy. It was incredible to see from
Kennedy’s perspective. Next was Don Pennebaker’s “The War Room,” which follows
a man named George championing for Bill Clinton in 1992. Again, we see a lot of
movement with the camera, as well as lots of close ups and zooms. Next, Jon
Alpert showed two different clips, a before and an after “he got over the
hump.” I think his greatest innovation was the direct connection with the
audience. When the subjects in his film would answer a question because he was
behind the camera they looked as though they were looking into the camera and speaking
to the audience directly. The effect of this technic is obvious in the second
film and makes it much more realistic to the viewer because you feel as though
you’re there. Next, Brett Morgan showed a clip from his film “On the Ropes,”
about three boxers in Brooklyn. He pointed out that sports and politics have a
built in natural arc, which gave them the opportunity to not use narration or
interviews and let the images, and subjects tell their story. This meant they
had to be with their subjects seven days a week for eighteen months, so they
could catch the action as it happen instead of having the subjects tell them
afterwards. Lastly, they showed Rory Kennedy’s American Hollow which she first intend
to be an advocacy film about welfare and poverty but then found a story within
a poor family and their lives.
Through more discussion with the
panelist I realized the similarities between the films that made them work.
First, camera movement is important; like Drew said camera movement is good if
your character moves with the camera. Within each film there were lots of
movement of camera angles as well as zooms. Next, all of them agreed that the
original idea of verite was to make a film that would tell the story without
narration or as little as possible. This is an idea that most of them followed
within their films. Cards also help some of them bridge the narrative gaps
within their stories. Lastly and most importantly, is finding good characters, like Morgan said,
“there are some people who aren’t good subject and then there are those who
lend themselves to the medium.” Actors and preachers are the most difficult
people to work with according to Drew. Finding those people who don’t act in
front of the camera but don’t notice they’re there either are the keys to
making a good piece of cinema verite.
So, can you actually capture real
life on camera? After this video I truly believe you can through certain
technics that these innovative filmmakers have provided over the years. If you
follow the similar patterns of these and other similar films, I think you can
capture real life on camera. The bottom line, though, is that trust between the
filmmaker and the subjects is the most important thing. The key is to be able
to make the characters comfortable enough to let the filmmakers all the way into
their lives whether what they see is good or bad.
No comments:
Post a Comment